@shitpostalotl (they/he) it doesn't support setting the isSensitive attribute on media, it supports CWs though but it assumes that the server on the other end is sane and won't SHOW THE FUCKING CWED CONTENT ANYWAY
the text part of the post was CW'd correctly. it's almost as if one of these things is meant for text and another for images. however this brings up the question of when you would ever want to CW just the text??
@shitpostalotl (they/he) the ActivityPub abstract (content warning) applies to the entire post object though, including any instances of attached media.
@shitpostalotl (they/he) I think it's actually the summary attribute that gets used as a content warning, which is already nonstandard, but the least you could do is not fuck up the semantics by having it not apply to the entire object
Pup Keith DX Director's Cut
in reply to Pup Keith DX Director's Cut •Pup Keith DX Director's Cut
Unknown parent •Content warning: furry porn
shitpostalotl ==> akko.unix.dog
in reply to Pup Keith DX Director's Cut • •Content warning: furry porn
Pup Keith DX Director's Cut
in reply to shitpostalotl ==> akko.unix.dog •Content warning: furry porn
Pup Keith DX Director's Cut
in reply to Pup Keith DX Director's Cut •Content warning: furry porn
shitpostalotl ==> akko.unix.dog
in reply to Pup Keith DX Director's Cut • •Pup Keith DX Director's Cut
in reply to shitpostalotl ==> akko.unix.dog •Pup Keith DX Director's Cut
in reply to Pup Keith DX Director's Cut •summaryattribute that gets used as a content warning, which is already nonstandard, but the least you could do is not fuck up the semantics by having it not apply to the entire objectshitpostalotl ==> akko.unix.dog
in reply to Pup Keith DX Director's Cut • •Pup Keith DX Director's Cut likes this.